Over 65 considerations. Eight domains. Greater than 200 determinations. One score.
Study design
Sample components: RCT, observational, randomization, blinding, allocation concealment, control adequacy.
Bias control
Sample components: Selection, performance, detection, attrition, reporting bias indicators.
Statistical methods
Sample components: Pre‑registration, primary endpoint, power, multiplicity handling, effect size reporting.
Reporting completeness
Sample components: CONSORT/PRISMA/STROBE adherence, supplementary completeness, transparency.
Conflicts & funding
Sample components: Funding source, author disclosures, sponsor role, registry alignment.
Replication
Sample components: External replication of findings, prior validation, or alignment with the broader evidence base.
Relevance to population
Sample components: How well the study population matches the target cohort selected for the score.
Journal reliability
Sample components: Indexed peer review, editorial standards, and publication-venue rigor.
Audited by clinicians. Versioned in public.
A clinician advisory board reviews scoring drift on a published cadence. When the rubric changes, the version is recorded on every report and your saved studies become free to re‑score.
- A treatment recommendation.
- An assessment of whether the study's findings are true.
- A judgment of how the study applies to a specific patient.
- A measure of journal prestige or citation impact.
The MedQuiry Score
A multivariable approach to evaluating medical research
How the scoring framework treats a study as a set of interdependent considerations rather than a checklist, why MedQuiry scores complete research rather than abstracts, and how journal quality and the audit process are handled.